IIBF ABM Module D: Unit 20 - Analysis of Financial Statements (Ratios)

Ratio
Analysis

The bedrock of financial assessment. Looking beyond ratios to detect data manipulation, financial control, and the hidden forensic risks in banking credit decisions.

Looking Beyond the Ratios

Financial analysis depends to a large extent on the use of Ratio analysis. However, Ratio analysis is only meaningful if the underlying data is correct. A banker must be certain of the figures giving rise to the ratios. What appears to be a strong case on paper can be very weak when reckoned with non-financial and physical factors.

Scenario Simulator & Health Score

Adjust the sliders to simulate business scenarios and watch the Credit Health Score recalibrate in real-time (2026 Standards).

90Health Score
Net Profit Margin 15.6%
Current Ratio 1.64:1
Audit Insight:Proposal appears strong. Metrics are within RBI/Standard norms.

Ratio Analysis Designer

Need to generate a professional distribution-ready report with charts? Launch our interactive designer.

Launch Designer

Common Data Manipulations

Examples of manipulations in figures resorted to show an exaggerated view of the financial position:

1. Asset Inflation

Inflating the value of inventory to mask liquidity strain.

2. Income Pre-recognition

Recording future cash receipts as current year's sales.

3. Liability Omission

Hiding inventory liabilities to polish the balance sheet.

4. Classification Fraud

Treating current debts as long-term to improve Current Ratio.

5. Expense Deferral

Pushing expenses or replenishments to next accounting year.

Non-Financial Lens

Location, managerial ability, and technical skill are equally vital.

The Banker's Forensic Lens

Super-sensitive areas and non-financial factors are the true indicators of a company's health. Below are live cases where looking beyond the figures saved the bank from potential credit catastrophes or enabled strategic growth.

Live Case 01

LMN Transports (P) Ltd. (Worthy Diversion)

TNW (31.3.18)71.5 Lacs
Sales Increase20% ↑
Current Ratio1.33+
Funds DivertedRs. 6 Lacs

Fleet owners and transport contractors dealing exclusively with our bank. Renewal proposal for 2018 envisaged enhancement from Rs. 12 Lacs to Rs. 16 Lacs.

Balance Sheet Audit Summary (Rs. in Lacs)
Item31.3.1731.3.18
Net Block (Less Deferred)55.0054.00
Investments (Shares)nil6.00
Net Working Capital16.0011.50
Tangible Networth (TNW)71.0071.50
Net Sales400.00480.00
Net Profit (Before Tax)19.0021.00

Diagnostic Analysis

01
Turnover Growth

Sales increased by 20% along with a corresponding rise in NPBT.

02
Leverage & Liquidity

Debt-to-TNW was favourable and Current Ratio was satisfactory at 1.35.

03
Apparent Diversion

Conclusion was drawn that Rs. 6 Lacs were diverted into shares, necessitating the loan request.

04
Strategic Motive

Actually, shares were purchased in large companies to secure transport contracts from them.

Banker's Verdict: Worthy Investment

The so-called 'culpable' diversion was a business promotion expense that drove Rs. 80 lacs in new revenue. Decision: Approved as strategic growth expense.

Live Case 02

Y Ltd (Mineral Exporter) (Quality of Assets)

TNW (2021)913 Lacs
CR (Paper)1.33:1
Sales Growth28% ↑
RequestNil Margin

A leading mineral exporter requested ad-hoc packing credit enhancement with 'nil' margin despite showing a healthy 1.33 current ratio.

Diagnostic Analysis

01
Stock Quality

Bulk of held stock were quarried items rejected and unfit for export, yet included in inventory.

02
Receivables Fraud

Buyer claims and deductions were hidden as 'receivables' instead of 'current liabilities'.

03
Actual Liquidity

Adjusting for bad stock and true liabilities, the actual CR was below 1.0.

Banker's Verdict: Hidden Liquidity Strain

The quality of current assets was compromised. Sound current ratio on paper was a facade. Moral: Asset Quality is more relevant than the Ratio itself.

Live Case 03

ABC Ltd (Associate Shell Capital)

A take-over proposal with impressive networth and good current ratio. Detailed investigation of the 4 associates revealed a circular manipulation.

Diagnostic Analysis

01
Staggered Closing

Associates M, N, O, P closed accounts at different dates (Dec, March, June, Sept).

02
Circular Capital

A single Rs. 10 lacs investment was transferred unit-to-unit sequentially to show capital in all five.

03
Leverage Fraud

Bank finance was availed by all units disproportionate to the actual single investment.

Banker's Verdict: Capital Recycling Detected

The manipulation was exposed only by consolidating Balance Sheets of all five units as on a single common date. Outcome: Proposal Rejected.

Live Case 04

XYZ Ltd (Round-Tripping Sales)

Company achieved the projected turnover with a steep rise in current assets, but scrutiny showed abnormal patterns.

Diagnostic Analysis

01
Profitability Lag

Despite steep increase in sales, overall profitability was only marginally higher.

02
Shadow Associate

An undisclosed associate company was found engaged in Rs. 3 crores of trading with nil stock.

03
Round Tripping

Parent company passed entries to associate, who later gave them back to inflate turnover.

Banker's Verdict: Artificial Sales Inflation

Fake entries were used purely to negotiate larger credit facilities. Conclusion: High credit risk / Integrity failure.

Live Case 05

PQR Ltd (Contracting Logic)

Sales (Yr III)200 Lacs
Profit (Yr I)12 Lacs
Profit (Yr III)10 Lacs

While sales increased from 100 to 200 lacs over 3 years, net profit declined from 12 to 10 lacs. A rash conclusion would suggest poor margin management.

Diagnostic Analysis

01
Input Costs

Possible increase in input costs without matching selling price hike.

02
Admin Overheads

Increase in selling and administration expenses not fully absorbed.

03
Accounting Basis

Company books profits only on realization, بينما expenses are accrual-based.

Banker's Verdict: Proper Evaluation Policy

Aggregate profits over 5 years showed a healthy increasing trend. Outcome: Credit support maintained despite short-term profit dip.

Live Case 06

KLM Ltd (Policy Distortion)

Proj. Sales275 Lacs
Actual Sales225 Lacs
CR (Prev Yr)1.33:1
CR (Current)1.21:1

Sanctioned for enhancement based on projected sales of 275 lacs. Actual turnover was 225 lacs and utilized full limit. A serious anomaly on the surface.

Diagnostic Analysis

01
Revenue Deferral

Company changed policy: did not book sales worth Rs. 50 Lacs (moved to next year).

02
Conservative Provisions

Higher provision for bad and doubtful debts was made on a conservative basis.

Banker's Verdict: Strategic Conservatism

Change in accounting policy distorted the Ratios but indicated prudent management. Moral: Study policy implications before rash conclusions.

Live Case 07

SM Textiles Ltd (Strategic Asset Renewal)

Profit DipRs. 1 Crore
Sales TrendFavourable
Current Ratio1.33:1

Net Profit dropped by Rs. 1 Crore while sales and prices were favourable and costs remained static. A puzzling trend at first glance.

Diagnostic Analysis

01
Physical Upgradation

Replaced old ring frames with efficient ones to improve quantity and quality of yarn.

02
Revenue vs Capital

Company charged 100% of purchase to 'Renewals, Repairs & Maintenance' as per IT Act.

03
Tax Arbitrage

By treating as revenue, company arrested tax outflow while utilizing surplus funds.

Banker's Verdict: Actual Liquidity Strong

Healthy asset renewal was masked as profit decline for tax efficiency. Conclusion: Actual position was superior to the reported Ratio.

Live Case 08

VRS Ltd (Strategic Ad Promotion)

Ad ExpensesRs. 3 Crore
Net ProfitMeagre
Current SalesDouble ↑

Meagre profits for three years despite high margins. The large advertisement spend appearing in P&L was the primary drag.

Diagnostic Analysis

01
Marketing Intensity

Massive ad campaigns across Indian and International popular dailies/magazines.

02
Deferred Benefit

Current year growth was directly tied to the brand-building exercises of the past 3 years.

Banker's Verdict: Growth Poincaré

Short-term profit dip was a strategic investment for rapid market capture. Outcome: Limit Sanctioned.

Live Case 09

X Ltd (Shadow Receivables)

InventoryN/A
ReceivablesUnbooked
AccountingCash Basis

A transport company booking revenue on realization but expenses on accrual. Critical assets were missing from the Balance Sheet.

Diagnostic Analysis

01
Hidden Assets

1.5 to 2 months of freight charges (receivables) were missing from the financial statements.

02
Tax Deferral

By using cash basis for income, company deferred incidence of advance-tax and income-tax.

Banker's Verdict: Forensic Scrutiny

Bank finance required relying on certified auditor statements of unbooked receivables. Moral: Go behind the financial statements.

Financial Control & Structural Ratios

Ratio analysis of financial statements is the process of calculating structural relations. It helps locatetrouble spots and suggest effective courses for action.

Example: ABC Ltd (1993 Control Audit)
LiabilitiesRs Lacs
Paid up capital1.50
Long term liabilities2.50
Short term funds1.00
Total5.00
AssetsRs Lacs
Net Fixed Assets3.50
Inventory1.00
Receivables + Cash0.50
Total5.00
LiquidityCurrent Ratio

Total Current Assets / Total Current Liabilities.
ABC Ltd Result: 1.50 : 1

Immediate SolvencyQuick Ratio

(Cash + Receivables) / Current Liabilities.
ABC Ltd Result: 0.50 : 1

Safety MarginProprietary Ratio

Shareholders' Funds / Total Assets.
ABC Ltd Result: 0.30 : 1

Asset ProfileFA to TNW+Term Debt

Net Fixed Assets / (Net Worth + Term Debt).
ABC Ltd Result: 0.87 : 1

Debt PressureDebt to TNW

Current Liabilities / Tangible Net Worth.
Should not exceed 0.80:1. ABC Ltd: 0.6: 1

Inventory HealthInv to NWC

Inventory / Net Working Capital.
Should not exceed 80%. ABC Ltd: 2: 1 (Very High)

Standard Safe Norms

Ratio DescriptorStandard Benchmark
Current Ratio2.00 : 1
Quick Ratio1.00 : 1
Current Liabilities to TNW0.75 : 1
Total Liabilities to TNW1.00 : 1 (Max 2.5:1)
Collection Period< 42 Days
Inventory Turnover> 3 Times
Sales to TNW8 Times (Mfg)

Public vs Private Sector Comparison

MetricPublic SectorPrivate Sector
201920202021201920202021
Sales / Total Assets0.6190.5900.5871.1311.1231.073
Current Ratio2.452.392.192.132.132.11
Avg Days: RM Stocks717268747570
Debt Equity Ratio1.431.511.571.401.371.40
Return on Net Worth (%)6.725.444.6812.6014.3712.33

Source: CMIE Corporate Data Recast

Interpretation Of Ratios: Unit A vs Unit B

Comparing two small-scale units with similar balance sheets. Which unit is the better credit risk?

UNIT A
Current Ratio0.54 : 1
Quick Ratio0.31 : 1
Earning Rate24.9%
Net Profit8.7%
Collection Period12 Days

Banker's Decision: Unit A is Preferred

Despite a lower current ratio (0.54), Unit A shows higher liquidity (Quick Ratio), superior earning power (24.9%), and overall efficient capital management. A is more desirable for lending.

Forensic & Risk Diagnostic Hub

Access the complete suite of 2026-compliant diagnostic engines for deeper credit audit.